Linearization of the full system

This forum if for discussing controls. Questions about how to implement controls in FAST are more appropriate to the CAE Tools forum.

Moderator: Bonnie.Jonkman

Guo.Wu
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 8:07 pm
Organization: MINGYANG SMART ENERGY
Location: China

Linearization of the full system

Postby Guo.Wu » Mon Dec 03, 2018 6:45 pm

Hello Everybody,

I am working on a kind of floating wind turbine platform by openfast. I should work out the linearization model for the design of control DLL. But maybe openfast can not cover linearization of the full system at this stage from the topic "The frequency component of flapwise". That means hydordyn, mooring modules can not be linearized by openfast now.

I want to ask If some other approximate substituted solution exists?

Jason.Jonkman
Posts: 4218
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: Linearization of the full system

Postby Jason.Jonkman » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:36 pm

Dear Guo.Wu,

There are generic system identification approaches to approximate linear state-space models, but a direct linearization would be more accurate. I think you'll have to wait for us to release the new linearization functionality in OpenFAST for floating wind turbines.

Best regards,
Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Senior Engineer | National Wind Technology Center (NWTC)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
15013 Denver West Parkway | Golden, CO 80401
+1 (303) 384 – 7026 | Fax: +1 (303) 384 – 6901
nwtc.nrel.gov

Guo.Wu
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 8:07 pm
Organization: MINGYANG SMART ENERGY
Location: China

Re: Linearization of the full system

Postby Guo.Wu » Tue Dec 04, 2018 2:46 am

Dear Dr. Jonkman,

Many thanks for your fast reply, I will consider your solution , and I am looking forward to the update of openfast.

Guo.Wu
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 8:07 pm
Organization: MINGYANG SMART ENERGY
Location: China

Re: Linearization of the full system

Postby Guo.Wu » Tue Dec 04, 2018 6:40 pm

Dear Dr. Jonkman,

Another approximative method I am thinking about is that. An additional section will be added at the bottom of the tower. The length and stiffness of the added section will be adjusted to make sure the mean displacement of the tower bottom will as same as the displacement when the floating platform added at the bottom. The Linearization of the full system will be approximated based on the adjusted model by openfast at this stage. I want to ask if this is a reasonable method?
Attachments
sketch of wind turbine.png
sketch of wind turbine.png (10.91 KiB) Viewed 1659 times

Jason.Jonkman
Posts: 4218
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: Linearization of the full system

Postby Jason.Jonkman » Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:49 pm

Dear Guo.Wu,

You intend to do this through the adjustment of the stiffness of the tower near its base? Due to the potentially large motion of the platform, I would think it would difficult to represent the floating-platform motion as a tower mode shape described by a low-order polynomial.

Best regards,
Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Senior Engineer | National Wind Technology Center (NWTC)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
15013 Denver West Parkway | Golden, CO 80401
+1 (303) 384 – 7026 | Fax: +1 (303) 384 – 6901
nwtc.nrel.gov

Guo.Wu
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 8:07 pm
Organization: MINGYANG SMART ENERGY
Location: China

Re: Linearization of the full system

Postby Guo.Wu » Wed Dec 05, 2018 12:23 am

Dear Dr. Jonkman,

Thank you very much for your advice.

zarei.atefe
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 7:13 am
Organization: self
Location: iran

Re: Linearization of the full system

Postby zarei.atefe » Fri May 03, 2019 9:22 am

hello
i have a question about linearization.I want to design a PID controller for pitch control. I need to use linearization and must pcmode = 0 in the linearization, but in this mode, the pitch control command is not taken from the simulink and the pitch angles are commanded zero.
How can I use pcmode = 4 and linearization ?
thanks.

Jason.Jonkman
Posts: 4218
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: Linearization of the full system

Postby Jason.Jonkman » Fri May 03, 2019 9:53 am

Dear Zarei,

If you want to design a PID controller, presumably you don't already have the controller. A linearization with PCMode = 0 simply means that the controller logic is not linearized and included in the state-space model. The pitch angles need not be zero, but the operating point pitch angles will be fixed at whatever you set in your FAST / OpenFAST model when linearizing. The inputs to the controller (outputs from various modules) and the controller commands (e.g. perturbations of the blade-pitch angle about the operating point) still show up as inputs/outputs in the linear state-space model, from which you can design your PID controller.

Best regards,
Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Senior Engineer | National Wind Technology Center (NWTC)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
15013 Denver West Parkway | Golden, CO 80401
+1 (303) 384 – 7026 | Fax: +1 (303) 384 – 6901
nwtc.nrel.gov


Return to “Controls”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest