Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Discuss theory and modeling of wind-turbine structures.

Moderator: Bonnie.Jonkman

Hakon.Christensen
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:59 am
Organization: DTU
Location: Denmark

Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Hakon.Christensen » Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:56 am

Dear All,

I am making a Matlab FE-model of the NREL 5MW Reference Wind Turbine. I am modelling the rotor as three 'blade beams' joint in a 'shaft beam', which is attached to the tower top. I would like to calibrate the shaft beam properties to (approximately) fit a reference Campbell diagram (natural frequencies w.r.t. rotation speed) of the rotor.

Does anyone have such a reference Campbell diagram of a rotor in a size matching the 5MW WTG? (Rotor diameter of app. 126 meters.)

Best regards,
Hakon Christensen

Jason.Jonkman
Posts: 4952
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Jason.Jonkman » Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:05 pm

Dear Hakon,

You can find a Campbell Diagram (without the influence of aerodynamic loads) for the NREL 5-MW turbine atop the OC3-Hywind spar in the FAST workshop presentations. Here's a deeplink (see slide 9): http://wind.nrel.gov/public/jjonkman/Pr ... onkman.pdf. The rotor modes of the NREL 5-MW turbine are not strongly dependent on the support structure.

Best regards,
Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Senior Engineer | National Wind Technology Center (NWTC)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
15013 Denver West Parkway | Golden, CO 80401
+1 (303) 384 – 7026 | Fax: +1 (303) 384 – 6901
nwtc.nrel.gov

Ruiliang.Wang
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 6:21 pm
Organization: YANSHAN UNIVERSITY
Location: China

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Ruiliang.Wang » Tue Jul 01, 2014 12:57 am

Hello,Jason

I have a question about Campbelldiagram,I see the 1P , 3P,6P,12P .3P maybe the turbine have three blades.I don't understand the 6P and 12P.
I think the 1P,2P and 3P are important.but I can't find the 2P.Is the 2P not significative?
Best Regard
Ruiliang.Wang

Jason.Jonkman
Posts: 4952
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Jason.Jonkman » Fri Jul 04, 2014 3:12 pm

Dear Ruiliang,

In the rotating frame (e.g., the blade root), you will see loads that are harmonics of the rotor speed, 1P, 2P, 3P, etc. But in the fixed frame (e.g., rotor speed, rotor torque, or tower), these loads are translated into harmonics of 3-times the rotor speed, 0P, 3P, 6P, etc., unless the rotor loads are imbalanced.

A Campbell Diagram is usually expressed with all modes converted to the fixed frame.

I hope that helps.

Best regards,
Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Senior Engineer | National Wind Technology Center (NWTC)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
15013 Denver West Parkway | Golden, CO 80401
+1 (303) 384 – 7026 | Fax: +1 (303) 384 – 6901
nwtc.nrel.gov

Jason.Lai
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:21 am
Organization: self
Location: Taiwan

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Jason.Lai » Tue Sep 30, 2014 1:20 am

Dear Jason,
Can you offer a Campbell Diagram (without the influence of aerodynamic loads) for the NREL 5-MW turbine atop the OC3-monopile?
I want to verify my result.
Thank you!

Best regards

Jason. Lai

Jason.Jonkman
Posts: 4952
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Jason.Jonkman » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:44 am

Dear Jason,

I don't have a Campbell diagram for the NREL 5-MW turbine atop the OC3-monopile, but I would expect that:
  • The support structure natural frequencies would be practically independent of rotor rotational speed. The first bending modes of the OC3-monopile support structure are just below 0.3 Hz and the second bending modes are just below 2.5 Hz.
  • The rotor natural frequencies would be practically independent of the support structure. Thus, other rotor modes are likely similar to the Campbell diagram we've calculated for the NREL 5-MW turbine atop the OC3-Hywind spar, as found on slide 9 of the "Linearization" presentation from our most recent FAST workshop: http://wind.nrel.gov/public/jjonkman/Pr ... onkman.pdf.
Best regards,
Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Senior Engineer | National Wind Technology Center (NWTC)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
15013 Denver West Parkway | Golden, CO 80401
+1 (303) 384 – 7026 | Fax: +1 (303) 384 – 6901
nwtc.nrel.gov

Matias.Sessaregodtu
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:01 am
Organization: Technical University of Denmark
Location: Denmark

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Matias.Sessaregodtu » Thu Sep 22, 2016 2:52 am

I want to reproduce myself slide 9 of the "Linearization" presentation from the FAST workshop.

Are you willing to provide all the FAST inputs and the Campbell.xls files used to create slide 9?

I want to create the exact same thing but for the onshore case, and reapply it for a turbine that I have designed by modifying the FAST input files accordingly.

Thank you,

Matias

Jason.Jonkman
Posts: 4952
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Jason.Jonkman » Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:24 am

Dear Matias,

Actually the Campbell Diagram shown on that slide was derived from one of my colleagues, and I don't have the original file.

However, as mentioned in my posted dated Sep 19, 2016 in the following forum topic: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=475&start=15, I've recently derived a Campbell Diagram of the land-based NREL 5-MW turbine with FAST v8.16 (and matched to what was derived with FAST v7). You can find the corresponding CampbellDiagram.xls file attached.

I'm presenting these results as part of a paper about the new linearization functionality of FAST v8 at TORQUE 2016, with the paper to be published soon. Here is an excerpt from the paper that describes how the Campbell Diagram was derived (starting with Test18 from the FAST v8.16 CertTest):

To compute the full-system natural frequencies of the NREL 5-MW baseline turbine as a function of rotor speed in the absence of aerodynamic loading, the ElastoDyn and ServoDyn modules are enabled and the InflowWind and AeroDyn modules are disabled. All pertinent structural DOFs are enabled in the ElastoDyn module—including blade-bending, drivetrain-torsion, generator-rotation, nacelle-yaw, and tower-bending DOFs—and gravitational loading and structural (but no aerodynamic) damping is included. The ServoDyn module provides nacelle-yaw actuator stiffness and damping. A separate linearization analysis is run at each rotor speed from 0 to 14 rpm, in steps of 2 rpm. The rotor-collective blade-pitch angles were fixed at 0˚. For each rotor speed, a periodic steady-state condition is found by marching the nonlinear solution in time long enough for start-up transients to die out (the start-up transients exist because gravity and rotor-rotation have an influence on the structural displacements, which are assumed undisplaced at time zero, and die out as a result of structural damping). After a periodic steady-state condition is reached, one more rotor (360˚) revolution is simulated, and an OP is set and the linearized full-system state matrix (A) is computed for each azimuth angle of the rotor in 36 steps of 10˚. The multiblade coordinate (MBC) postprocessor [6] is used to read-in the periodic state matrices, apply the MBC transformation to the rotating states to transform them to states in the fixed frame, azimuth-average the MBC-transformed state matrices, compute the eigensolution of the resulting azimuth-averaged matrix, and extract the natural (undamped) frequencies from this eigensolution.

Best regards,
Attachments
CampbellDiagram.xls
(1.67 MiB) Downloaded 382 times
Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Senior Engineer | National Wind Technology Center (NWTC)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
15013 Denver West Parkway | Golden, CO 80401
+1 (303) 384 – 7026 | Fax: +1 (303) 384 – 6901
nwtc.nrel.gov

Enes.Tunca
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 7:17 am
Organization: Istanbul Technical University
Location: Türkiye

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Enes.Tunca » Fri Nov 18, 2016 2:03 am

Jason.Jonkman wrote:You can find a Campbell Diagram (without the influence of aerodynamic loads) for the NREL 5-MW turbine atop the OC3-Hywind spar in the FAST workshop presentations.


Dear Jason,

I wonder the calculation without the influence of aerodynamic loads. Is it done by the input flags or during the post-processing?

With regards.

Jason.Jonkman
Posts: 4952
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Jason.Jonkman » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:25 am

Dear Enes,

As mentioned in my forum post dated Sep 22, 2016 above, the FAST v8 linearization analysis used to derive the Campbell Diagram of the land-based NREL 5-MW turbine involved disabling the InflowWind and AeroDyn modules, meaning that the influence of aerodynamic loads is eliminated up front, rather than during post-processing.

Our TORQUE 2016 paper regarding the new linearization functionality of FAST v8 is now available online: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67015.pdf.

Best regards,
Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Senior Engineer | National Wind Technology Center (NWTC)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
15013 Denver West Parkway | Golden, CO 80401
+1 (303) 384 – 7026 | Fax: +1 (303) 384 – 6901
nwtc.nrel.gov

Enes.Tunca
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 7:17 am
Organization: Istanbul Technical University
Location: Türkiye

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Enes.Tunca » Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:15 am

Dear Jason,

Thanks for reply. Actually I was looking a case study to verify my results for NREL 5MW linearization with FAST v7. And I encounter with this topic. I tried to linearize at different rotor speed to generate the campbell diagram. But solution was not converged with RotSpeed under 9.0 rpm. (except 0 rpm because it is linearized static equilibrium point). I don't understand what the problem is. I tried to what error message said me to do, and incrased Tmax, and changed DispTol and VelTol. It is still not solved. May you give any advice about it?

With regards

Jason.Jonkman
Posts: 4952
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Jason.Jonkman » Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:07 am

Dear Enes,

My understanding is that you are linearizing without aerodynamics i.e. CompAero = False. Without aerodynamics, my guess is using CalcStdy = False would be sufficiently accurate. What are you using for CalcStdy and TrimCase?

Best regards,
Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Senior Engineer | National Wind Technology Center (NWTC)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
15013 Denver West Parkway | Golden, CO 80401
+1 (303) 384 – 7026 | Fax: +1 (303) 384 – 6901
nwtc.nrel.gov

Enes.Tunca
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 7:17 am
Organization: Istanbul Technical University
Location: Türkiye

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Enes.Tunca » Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:00 am

Dear Jason,

CompAero was set True in my analysis, I was not aware of CompAero should be False to exclude aerodynamics. In fact, that was what I try to ask in my first post (Nov 18, 2016). I probably couldn't make myself clear.

Also, I use CalcStdy=True and TrimCase=2, because I was not sure about the initial conditions in primary input file. So I just wanted to let FAST calculate the operating point. Can I get the accurate solution if I only change the RotSpeed when CalcStdy=False (while all other initial conditions are set zero) ?

One last question. So, should I set CalcStdy=False while CompAero=False?

With regards.

Jason.Jonkman
Posts: 4952
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Jason.Jonkman » Wed Nov 23, 2016 12:25 pm

Dear Enes,

You can use the linearization options that you want, but when aerodynamics are disabled (CompAero = False), the trim solutions may not function properly. FAST v8 allows you to linearize at any point in time, without a trim solution, so, it is probably easier to use for cases without aerodynamics. When aerodynamics are disabled, the only other load is gravity, and, depending on the case, it may be sufficiently accurate to linearize about the initial conditions.

Best regards,
Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Senior Engineer | National Wind Technology Center (NWTC)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
15013 Denver West Parkway | Golden, CO 80401
+1 (303) 384 – 7026 | Fax: +1 (303) 384 – 6901
nwtc.nrel.gov

Amadou.Damba
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 5:21 am
Organization: self
Location: Germany

Re: Campbell diagram for 5MW turbine rotor

Postby Amadou.Damba » Thu Dec 08, 2016 1:29 am

Dear All,

I try to identify the natural frequencies of an offshore FAST model. so i linearized the NREL 5MW Onshore Wind Turbine (from Test18) with FAST v7 to get a Campbell Diagram. But i don't know if my data for blade “collective”, “progressive” and “regressive” are exact . furthermore my Drivetrain frequency behaves like for OC3 Hywind Spar.I supose my input file is for OC3 Hywind Spar. but i can't found any file comparable to Test 18 to linearize with FAST 7. Can anyone help me please. Here is an is my Result.

Best regards,
Damba Amadou
Attachments
CampbellDiagramCom.xls
(1.7 MiB) Downloaded 210 times


Return to “Structural Analysis”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest