Topics of general, but wind-related interest.

Moderator: Bonnie.Jonkman

Yanda.Jiang
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 7:44 pm
Organization: Iowa state university
Location: United States

Hi guys,

I just started to learn betz's law and wanna ask a question about it.
Capture.PNG (27.57 KiB) Viewed 2446 times

Capture2.PNG (4.6 KiB) Viewed 2446 times

In betz's law, the "1/2*rho*At*Uu^3" is regarded as wind power input, but why don't we use "1/2*rho*Au*Uu^3" instead? I suppose this is the real wind power input at the very beginning.

Yanda

Jason.Jonkman
Posts: 5738
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Dear Yanda,

It is common practice to use the swept area of the rotor (A_t) as the reference in the Betz limit because if the rotor was absent, the flow would not slow down and would pass through that area unaffected. The area A_u is smaller than swept area because the wind slows down due to the presence of the rotor and is not known apriori, but can be solved as part of the solution of momentum equations.

Best regards,
Jason Jonkman, Ph.D.
Senior Engineer | National Wind Technology Center (NWTC)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
15013 Denver West Parkway | Golden, CO 80401
+1 (303) 384 – 7026 | Fax: +1 (303) 384 – 6901
nwtc.nrel.gov

Yanda.Jiang
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 7:44 pm
Organization: Iowa state university
Location: United States

Jason.Jonkman wrote:Dear Yanda,

It is common practice to use the swept area of the rotor (A_t) as the reference in the Betz limit because if the rotor was absent, the flow would not slow down and would pass through that area unaffected. The area A_u is smaller than swept area because the wind slows down due to the presence of the rotor and is not known apriori, but can be solved as part of the solution of momentum equations.

Best regards,

Thx Jason. Great clarification. I appreciate your help.

Best regards,
Yanda

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest