| Certification |
|
Integrating the NREL Wind Turbine Development Process and the Proposed Certification ProcessAbstractThe National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has developed a comprehensive engineering development process which includes regular design, testing and documentation reviews. Similar reviews are required for ISO 9001 certification. International wind turbine certification practice typically requires a review of only the final design and testing results of a wind turbine system. Using this approach, if the design does not meet requirements, the designer is faced with the lengthy and inefficient process of rerunning engineering calculations or tests or even redesigning major components. NREL has recognized the similarity between its development process and international certification practice, and has developed a wind turbine design and engineering process that integrates the two. The result is a process that enables subcontractors participating in the DOE/NREL's Turbine Research Program to develop a mature product which is ready for commercialization and certification. This paper provides an overview of NREL's development process, certification requirements and the benefits of integrating them together. || Contents || IntroductionInternational certification has become a requirement for U.S. manufacturer's to compete in many foreign markets. At present there are three international certification bodies active in the European wind turbine industry, Germanischer Lloyd (ref: 1), Riso (ref 2) and CIWI (ref 3). Each certification body has developed its own rules and requirements for Type Certification same but they generally have the goal; to review the design the turbine documentation and assure that has been designed accordance with with engineering discipline and in recognized reliably throughout it's industry standards, and will function specified life. Most turbines installed in Europe must be certified by one of these bodies to their own set of rules and requirements. Over the past five years the European Community (EC) has encouraged harmonization of the different certification rules in order to facilitate trade within Europe. This has resulted in active standards development programs on the international level. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has supported the development of several standards which will hopefully be the basis for a set of harmonized international standards. While European certification procedures depend on national requirements, the international standards will be the basis for an international certification procedure, such as described in item 1 of the above list. IEC 1400-1 specifies "external conditions" (wind and environmental), normal and abnormal operating , conditions that must be satisfied for different design classes. ISO quality (ref : 17, 18, 19) and limit state design (ref 20 ) procedures are also specified and clarified for the wind turbine design application. European certification bodies will take a step towards harmonization by adopting this standard in addition to their own national requirements in the future by law. Certification of wind turbines in the U.S. is not required by utilities, customers or local governments. As a result most turbine manufactures have not pursued certification. Now that the international market is stronger than the domestic market there is greater interest by U.S. manufacturers to certify their wind turbines, however, there is no U. S. certification body nor is there an established set of standards on which to base a certification process. The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) has been active in developing national standards for 15 years. This process has resulted in useful standards but they are not used by the international community since it is felt they are not sufficiently proscriptive. AWEA has decided to support the IEC standards development process since these standards will be valuable for international marketing. Several U. S. companies have participated in the DOE/NREL Turbine Research Program (TRP). This program has a well established design review process with regular design reviews and test readiness reviews as prototype turbines evolve from conceptual to final design stages. In many ways this program parallels Europe's certification programs. With minor modifications the TRP has aligned its requirements to match the IEC certification requirements. Companies that participate in this program can now expect to finish the program with all the documentation and reviews needed to satisfy the IEC certification requirements as they are developed. || Contents || |
|
DOE/NREL Turbine Research ProgramThere has always been debate about how to approach the wind turbine design and development process. Some favor an analytical approach with very little testing. In this case, testing is used only as a verification of the final design analysis predictions. Others favor an empirical approach in which components are designed with very little analysis and tested to meet very basic design loads. Each component is developed experimentally until a prototype can be built using the tested components. The prototype test results are then used to develop more complete design loads which includes dynamic loading. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages. Analytical tools can be used to iterate the design to an optimum configuration efficiently before building components and simulate design conditions which are extremely unlikely to occur during a test program. The disadvantage of this approach is that designers are likely to miss important details which cannot be modeled completely. The experimental approach will test all the design details but is not likely to subject the prototype to critical design limits. The best approach logically combines a balance of both analysis and testing to verify analytical models. Once a reliable set of design loads are established and the analytical model is refined, experiments can be conducted to subject a component to laboratory and field test conditions that simulate most of the extreme static and fatigue load conditions. |
|
Figure 1. The NREL Advanced Turbine Development Process
|
|
| Figure 1 shows the NREL
"Design and Analysis Track" and the "Test and Verification Track" for
product development. The combination of these two tracks presents a system of checks and
balances of analytic predictions combined with test results. The 'Design and Analysis
Track' shows the stages of design starting with Conceptual Design and ending with
verification that the original design specifications have been met. The 'Test and
Verification Track' shows how the design process is verified in stages, first component
qualification tests and finally prototype reliability tests, which should lead to
certification. The results of the 'Test and Verification Track' are used to check the
predictions developed in the 'Design and Analysis Track'. As such the iterations that
occur in each of the design stages (vertically) are checked against the results of the
testing stage which are fed back into the design stages. At the preliminary design stage design requirements and the initial configuration are established. For all DOE/NREL funded programs IEC 1400-1 defines the basic design requirements. NREL recommends that manufacturers meet with the certification agents to clearly define all certification requirements before the design effort begins. Preliminary analysis is done to begin to quantify the loads and economics of the wind turbine system. At the detailed design stage the preliminary analysis is refined by incorporation of qualification test results, such as blade tests and modal tests, into a detailed dynamics analysis. The results of these analyses contribute to a loads document. This is a living document which is used to define all design loads. It should also include all test data used to verify predicted loads. As the design evolves and changes to the design are made, new design loads should be documented as updates to this document. A document like this is required by all certification bodies. At the final design stage, final analysis has occurred and resulted in complete design drawings and specifications for all aspects of the machine. Manufacturing, operation, maintenance and installation manuals should also be complete. This documentation constitutes a complete description of the design, how to build the machine and how the machine is to be installed and operated. This collection of documentation is what the certification body will use to verify that the design complies with IEC 1400-1. Prototype loads data collected during field tests are used to verify the predicted design loads and operational characteristics. Blade structural tests are used to verify the fatigue life and extreme load capacity of the blade (ref 21). Performance measurements are made to verify turbine performance. Noise measurements are made to document acoustic emissions. These tests are conducted to IEC standards and constitute Type Testing requirements specified in the draft IEC certification standard. It is extremely important to select test sites which represent the design wind regime, extreme conditions and environmental conditions when ever possible. This development process satisfies most certification requirements for a Type Certificate. || Contents || |
|
Certification RequirementsThe proposed IEC Type Certification procedures have four basic sets of components.
It will be possible to obtain conformity statements for successfully completing all the requirements of each component. When the first three component conformity statements are issued and the design loads are verified with type test data a Type Certificate can be issued. The fourth component defines tests which quantify the turbine performance characteristics. These tests are not required to demonstrate the safety of the turbine and are therefore not required to meet basic type certification requirements, but they are usually required by customers to verify performance characteristics which can effect the economics of their investment. Noise and Power Quality tests are usually requirements to meet government regulations. Figure 2 lists the requirements in each area. || Contents || |
|
Figure 2 TYPICAL TYPE CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
|
|
The specific requirements
for each element may change depending on which set of national requirements and perhaps
which certification agent is used. The descriptions below are intended to describe general
requirements for each element. Design EvaluationComponent Tests:
Loads
Verification Document: Load Case Analysis (Loads Document): Control
& Protection System: Structural
Component Design: Mechanical & Electrical Design
Document: Design
Control Quality Plan: Installation
Quality Plan / Manual: Maintenance
Manual: Operations
Manual: Personnel
Safety Manual: || Contents || |
|
Type TestingSafety Test: Dynamic Behavior:
Load
Measurements: || Contents || |
|
Manufacturing Quality SystemManufacturing Quality Plan: The purpose of a manufacturing quality plan is to document a manufacturing process or set of procedures that will produce a wind turbine which meets the design specifications. This plan should include all the quality procedures for monitoring and documenting critical design specifications of components, assembly of the system and final assembly checkout tests. ISO 9002 (ref: 19) is a good model for this plan. IEC certification standards will require that the certification body include this plan before a Type Certificate can be issued. || Contents || |
|
Turbine CharacteristicsPower Performance Test: Wind turbine performance can be very difficult to predict and is crucial to the economic viability of the turbine. IEC 1400-12 specifies an internationally agreed upon procedure for accurate methods of power performance measurements for individual grid connected turbines. It is easier to verify the performance of a single turbine than the performance of a collection of turbines in a wind farm. Performance of small turbines operating with variable loads such as batteries are even more difficult to characterize. Standards for the latter two cases are not available. A power performance test is not required for safety reasons but is generally required to confirm predicted performance for the customer.. This procedure is intended to be performed by a certified, accredited laboratory. The certification body will require a test report from such a laboratory as part of the Type Testing documentation. Noise Test: Noise testing is also part of the performance documentation of the machine. This test is not a safety test and is therefore optional. However many European countries require an acoustical emission test and compliance with a national standard for noise emissions. These tests must be conducted by an independent accredited laboratory. IEC Working Group 5 (WG5) has developed a draft test. This document will be circulated for national vote within two months. Power Quality Test: In many countries the utilities are asking for a power quality standard for wind turbines. They want a standard that addresses issues that are specific to wind turbines, such as power flicker, inrush currents, harmonic distortion and power factor. IEC WG 10 was formed to develop such a standard. This group is taking advantage of existing standards, such as IEC 1000, as much as possible. This is also considered an optional test since it is a performance related issue. || Contents || |
|
Project CertificationSome experts believe Project Certification is needed to verify that the turbine is installed according to the turbine design specifications and that the site conditions are consistent with the design conditions. Others feel that Project Certification is not needed. In many cases all components of project certification are too costly and not economically justified, especially for small turbine installations. In these cases elements of the project certification may be selected to satisfy the customers needs. The opponents believe that this certification should not be included in the standard because it will routinely and inappropriately be requested by uninformed local governments. The working group is still debating the merits of Project Certification and has tentatively proposed the following procedure which might be appropriate for a large, multiple turbine installation. Figure 3 describes three basic requirements for project certification, 1) project design conformity, 2) a Type Certificate and 3) maintenance and performance surveillance. |
|
| Project Design Conformity:
Much of the installation must be designed to meet local site conditions and local
government requirements. Designs for the foundation must meet local soil conditions,
electrical systems must interface with an existing electrical grid and local requirements
may dictate a certain tower type. These issues result in installation designs which must
be performed correctly if the overall turbine installation is to operate reliably. To
assure that the installation is performed according to design specifications the
installation process is reviewed and monitored (Works Surveillance). A Site Assessment is
required by IEC 1400-1 to assure that the site conditions are less demanding than the
turbine design conditions. This site assessment requires documentation of wind conditions
through measurements such as 10 minute mean wind speed, turbulence intensity, maximum gust
magnitudes and maximum instantaneous wind shear. Wind data from wind resource assessments
can be used if the data sampling rates and record averaging time are compatible with IEC
1400-12 (Power Performance Measurement Techniques). Once the turbine installation
satisfies the site assessment, electrical and works surveillance and installation
surveillance a Project Design Conformity Statement can be issued. Type Certificate: A Type Certificate, as previously described, is required before a Project Certificate will be issued. Operations and Maintenance Surveillance: O&M Surveillance is intended to verify that the turbine is operated within it's design conditions according to the operating manual. The maintenance is monitored to assure that the turbine is maintained according to specifications defined in the maintenance manual. In order to maintain a Project Certificate, O&M Surveillance is conducted regularly throughout the life of the project. Unannounced audits are conducted by the certification body (usually annually) to assure these procedures are being faithfully performed. || Contents || |
|
| Figure 3 TYPICAL
PROJECT CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
|
|
NREL's Certification ProgramNREL has been directed by the U.S. Department of Energy to facilitate the development of a U. S. Certification program for wind turbines. This program must result in certifications which are accepted throughout the world. NREL is not authorized to issue certificates according to their contract with the DOE, but is able to perform tests and design reviews that would meet certification standards. NREL can supply these reviews to a certification agent who can use them in their certification process. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL) is an international certification body operating in the U. S. and throughout the world. They have expressed an interest in coordinating their expertise in electrical equipment certification and manufacturing quality reviews with NREL's wind turbine design expertise to develop a certification program. Figure 4 illustrates the proposed interactions among UL, NREL and the applicant. This certification program proposes that the applicant contract with UL for a certification. UL can perform all electrical equipment reviews and manufacturing quality reviews and subcontract to NREL for design reviews of certification documents and type testing. UL anticipates using NREL reports to support their certification of the applicant's turbine. UL has field representatives located globally which could be used to perform much of the field surveillance during project certification. |
|
| Figure 4
CERTIFICATION ORGANIZATION AND ROLES
|
|
Integrated Development / CertificationThe DOE/NREL Turbine Research program is responsible for assuring that turbines developed in the program are designed according to good engineering practice. Meeting IEC standards simultaneously satisfies both NREL's due diligence responsibilities and the certification bodies' design conformance responsibilities. NREL requires documentation of all the important design steps. By coordinating NREL's contractually required deliverables with IEC documentation requirements, the development process becomes more efficient. NREL's design reviews are scheduled throughout the design process. Design requirements for the Turbine Research program are defined at the beginning of the program. Certification requirements will be defined at the same time. As certification documentation becomes available, NREL can perform Certification Reviews. If deficiencies exist, the designers will become aware of them early in the development process. This approach reduces the chances that design changes will be mandated by certification requirements which were poorly defined at the beginning of the design process. The Turbine Research program requires testing of components such as the blades and of the whole prototype turbine. Generally, engineering prototypes are tested for loads and proof of concept testing. The design is then refined based on the test results. A production prototype is fabricated and tested for final performance, dynamics and reliability. These tests can satisfy Type Testing requirements if conducted by an accredited laboratory to IEC standards. || Contents || |
|
SummaryCertification has become a necessity for the international wind turbine market. Presently U. S. manufacturers must use European certification agents to get the required certification. NREL has integrated preparation for certification into their Turbine Research program which facilitates the certification process. UL is interested in establishing a certification program with NREL. This program will offer the U. S. wind industry a U. S. based alternative with world wide authority for certification of their wind turbines. References
|
|
| This report was
prepared by C. P. (Sandy)
Butterfield and Tom Wollan |
|
| || Contents || | |
|| Home || Certification || Testing || Evaluation || Standards || Information || |
|